Interactive Elements in the Program "Direct Line with Vladimir Putin" (2001-2018)
Download paperPhD in Philology, Associate Professor at the Chair of Television and Radio Broadcasting, Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: Y_Dolgova@newmail.ruEditor of the Business News group of the NTV television program “Today”, Moscow, Russia
e-mail: pimenova1993@list.ruSection: Television and Radio
“Direct Line with Vladimir Putin” is a unique format of Russian socio-political broadcasting provoking a steady interest of the television audience. At the same time, it causes a discussion about authenticity and interactivity of communication between people and authorities in a live phone-in. The purpose of this article was to study the interactive elements used to generate communication between the President and people in the programme, ways to combine them and the degree of interactivity of these elements. As interactive elements, we understand any question from viewers put in different forms and the President’s answers. The article proposes the criteria of interactivity of these elements. During the first stage of the study, the interactive elements were identified, in the second stage, according to the selected criteria, the degree of their interactivity was determined. As expected by the authors, all the installments of the program are based on a combination of elements with high and low degree of interactivity, which allows the founders of the program to realize a range of socially important tasks. It was found that during the first three installments the share of the elements with high degree of interactivity was slightly higher than that of the elements with low degree of interactivity. The study also showed that the increase in the number of interactive elements does not indicate an increase in the level of interactivity of the “Direct Line”.
DOI: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.1.2020.5978References:
Andronikov I. (1975) Slovo napisannoe i slovo skazannoe. V 2 t. T. 2 [The Word Written and the Word Spoken. In 2 Vol. Vol. 2]. Moscow. (In Russian)
Baluev D. G., Chekulaev E. P. (2010) Informacionnaya politika i formy interaktivnogo vzaimodejstviya v sovremennoj Rossii [Information Policy and Forms of Interactive Communication in Modern Russia]. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Politologiya. Regionovedenie. Vestn. Nizhegorodsk. un-ta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo 5 (1): 317–321. (In Russian)
Brants К., Voltmer K. (2011) Mediatization and De-Centralization of Political Communication. In Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy: Challenge the Primacy of Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.1057/9780230294783
Bucy E. P. (2004) Interactivity in Society: Locating an Elusive Concept. The Information Society 20: 373–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490508063
Dolgova Yu. I. (2014) Realizaciya obshchestvennogo zaprosa v teleprogrammah «Pryamaya liniya s Prezidentom Rossii» i «Razgovor s Vladimirom Putinym. Prodolzhenie» [Implementation of Public Demand in TV Programs “Direct Line With the President of Russia” and “Conversation with Vladimir Putin. Continuation”]. In Social’nye aspekty sovremennogo veshchaniya v Rossii [Social Aspects of Modern Russian Broadcasting]. Moscow: Fak. zhurn. MGU. Pp. 10–24. (In Russian)
Dolgova Yu. I. (2018) Transformaciya obshchestvenno-politicheskogo televeshchaniya v postsovetskij period: faktory, parametry, problemy [Transformation of Socio-Political Television Broadcasting in the Post-Soviet Period: Factors, Parameters and Challenges]. Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 10: Zhurnalistika 5: 62–83. DOI: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.5.2018.6282 (In Russian)
Dugin E. Ya., Kupriyanov O. A. (2017) Antropocentricheskaya model’ kommunikacii v kontekste cennostnyh predpochtenij televizionnoj auditorii [Anthropocentric Model of Communication in the Context of Value Preferences of the Television Audience]. Gumanitarij Yuga Rossii 5 (6): 82–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2017.5.6 (In Russian)
Gulenko P. V. (2016) Obshchestvenno-politicheskoe tok-shou na telekanale NTV: proektirovanie formata [Socio-Political Talk Show on the NTV Channel: Format Designing]. MediaAl’manah 4: 56–64. (In Russian)
Gulenko P. V., Dolgova Yu. I. (2016) Problemy klassifikacii sovremennyh peredach: sushchnostnye harakteristiki formata «tok-shou» [Problems of Classification of Modern Television Programs: the Essential Characteristics of the Talk Show Format]. Vestn. RUDN. Seriya: Literaturovedenie. Zhurnalistika 3: 102–110. (In Russian)
Habermas J. (1984) The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964). New German Critique 3 Autumn: 49–55.
Habermas J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Horton D., Wohl R. R. (1956) Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance. Psychiatry 19 (3): 215– 229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
Karataev R. Yu. (2017) Posledstviya perekhoda v Rossii na cifrovoe veshchanie dlya regional’nogo TV [Consequences of Transition to Digital Broadcasting in Russia for Regional TV]. Vestnik KGU 3: 150–154. (In Russian)
Katz E., Lazarsfeld P. F. (1955) Personal Influence. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Kemarskaya I. N. (2004) Televizionnyj redaktor [Television Editor]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russian)
Kiousis S. (2002) Interactivity: a Concept Explication. New Media and Society 4 (3): 355–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146144480200400303
Kohanov E. F. (2015) Politicheskie tok-shou: dialogichnost’ i interaktivnost’ [Political Talk Shows: Dialogueness and Interactivity]. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki 4 (1): 50–59. (In Russian)
Korotkov P. A., Matveeva O. A., Ryzhakova O. E., Zagajnova E. A. (2017) Aktual’nost’ kolichestvennoj ocenki kachestva pryamogo vzaimodejstviya grazhdan i vlasti [Relevance of Quantitative Assessment of the Quality of Direct Interaction Between Citizens and Authorities]. Gosudarstvo i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo 4: 199–207. (In Russian)
Kuhn R., Nielsen R. K. (eds.) (2013) Political Journalism in Transition: Western Europe in a Comparative Perspective. London: I. B. Tauris.
Kul’chickaya D. Yu. (2018) Mul’timedia kak kommunikacionnyj fenomen: analiz zarubezhnyh issledovanij [Multimedia as a Communication Phenomenon: an Analysis of Foreign Scholarly Research]. Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Seriya 10: Zhurnalistika 6: 94–112. DOI: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.6.2018.94112 (In Russian)
Kuznecov G. V. (2004) Tak rabotayut zhurnalisty TV [TV Journalist Work This Way]. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta. (In Russian)
Livingstone S., Lunt P. (1994) Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London, New York: Routledge.
Lukina M. M. (ed.) (2013) Internet-SMI: тeoriya i praktika [Internet Media: Theory and Practice]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russian)
McMillan S. J., Hwang J. S. (2002) Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity. Journal of Advertising 31 (3): 29– 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674
McNair B., Hibberd M. (2003) Mediated Access Political Broadcasting, the Internet and Democratic Participation. In Broadcasting and Convergence: New Articulations of the Public Service Remit. Goteborg: Nordicom. Pp. 269–285.
Neuman W. R. (2008) Interactivity, Concept of. In International Encyclopedia of Communication. Pp. 2318–2322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbieci043
Papathanassopoulos S., Negrine R. (2015) A Crisis in Political Communication? In European Media in Crisis, Values, Risks and Policies. New York: Routledge. Pp. 147–160.
Pobereznikova E. V. (2004) Televidenie vzaimodejstviya: Interaktivnoe pole obshcheniya [Television of Interaction: Interactive Field of Communication]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russian)
Rafaeli S., Ariel Y. (2007) Assessing Interactivity in Computer-Mediated Research. In Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Pp. 71–88. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199561803.013.0006
Sappak V. S. (1988) Televidenie i my [Television and We]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russian)
Scannell P. (1996) Radio, Television and Modern Life. A Phenomenological Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sundar S. S. (2004) Theorizing Interactivity’s Effects. The Information Society 20 (5): 387–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490508072
Timberg B. M., Erler R. J. (2002) Television Talk: a History of the TV Talk Show. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Vertov D. (1966) Stat’i. Dnevniki. Zamysly [Articles. Diaries. Ideas]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russian)