New Historicism and Historical Representations in the Digital Environment

Download paper
Diana Yu. Solovyova

Teaching and Learning Specialist at the Academic Office, Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: di.solov@mail.ru

Section: Modern Journalism: Subjects and Issues

The article describes new representation forms of historical knowledge in modern digital media scene. The author introduces the concept of «history virtualization», which suggests supplying additional meanings to actual historical materials, and studies various virtualization scenarios such as an ironic reinterpretation of a historical event, its mythologization and symbolization, interactive and game representations of history and the loss of connection between a symbol and historical reality. The visual representation form, the addition of ironic meaning and the presence of many equivalent viewpoints in cyberspace result in such a phenomenon as an internet meme. A historical meme is a «laughter» response of the mass audience to public events, but it involves history simplification and stereotypification. The phenomenon of history mythologization is characterized by history interpretation and update from the ideological perspective. In this case, interpretation may replace reality. Breaking the connection between reality and representation is also typical of interactive forms of the presentation of historical material. In interactive games, the user can only make a virtual decision. A lot of opportunities for virtual interaction with historical, political or social materials replace the user‘s real participation in the ongoing social process.

Keywords: new historicism, historical issues in the media, history in the digital environment, internet meme, history mythologization, Stephen Greenblatt
DOI: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.4.2018.2654

References:

Assmann J. (2004) Kul’turnaya pamyat’: pis’mo, pamyat’ o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost’ v vysokikh kul’turakh drevnosti [Cultural Memory: Writing, Memory of the Past and Political Identity in Great Ancient Cultures]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury Publ. (In Russian)

Brannigan J. (1998) New Historicism and Cultural Materialism. New York: St. Martin‘s Press.

Daston L. (2007) Nauchnaya ob”ektivnost’ so slovami i bez slov [Scientific Objectivity With and Without Words]. In D. Aleksandrov (ed.) Nauka i nauchnost’ v istoricheskoy perspective [Science and Scientificity in the Historical Perspective]. Moscow: Khagnera Publ. (In Russian)

Etkind A. (2001) Novyy istorizm, russkaya versiya [New Historicism, the Russian Version]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie 47. (In Russian). Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2001/47/edkin.html 

Fineman J. (1989) The History of the Anecdote: Fiction and Fiction. In H. A. Veeser (ed.) The New Historicism. London: Routledge.

Greenblatt S. (1988) Shakespearean Negotiations: the Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Greenblatt S. (1991) Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Greenblatt S. (1999) Formirovanie “ya” v epokhu Renessansa: ot Mora do Shekspira: glavy iz knigi [Renaissance Self-Fashioning: from More to Shakespeare]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (35): 34–77. (In Russian). Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/1999/35/grinblat.html 

Kolozaridi P. V. (2016) Mem o besslavii [A Meme About Disgrace]. Logos 26 (6). (In Russian). Available at: http://www.logosjournal.ru/arch/90/115_12.pdf 

Lazarsfeld P., Merton R. (1948) Mass Communication, Popular Taste and Organized Social Action. In Bryson (ed.) The Communication of Ideas. New York: Harper and Brothers.

Nora P. (1999) Mezhdu pamyat’yu i istoriey [Between Memory and History]. In Frantsiya-pamyat’ [France-Memory]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Univ. Publ. Pp. 17–50. (In Russian)

Rorty R. (ed.) (1967). The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Smirnov I. P. (2001) Novyy istorizm kak moment istorii [New Historicism as a Moment of History]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (47). (In Russian). Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2001/47/smir.html

Solov’eva D. Yu. (2016) Otrazhenie printsipov novogo istorizma v sovremennykh SMI [Principles of New Historicism as Reflecfted in Modern Media]. Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 10: Zhurnalistika 5: 98–120. (In Russian)

Vasil’ev A. G. (2008) Sovremennye memory studies i transformatsiya klassicheskogo naslediya [Modern Memory Studies and the Transformation of Classical Heritage]. In L. P. Repina (ed.) Dialogi so vremenem: pamyat‘ o proshlom v kontekste istorii. Moscow: Krug“ Publ. (In Russian)

Webster F. (2004) Teorii informatsionnogo obshchestva [Theories of the Information Society]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russian)

White H. (2002) Metaistoriya. Istoricheskoe voobrazhenie v Evrope XIX veka [Metahistory: Historical Imagination in 19th-Century Europe]. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Publ. (In Russian)