The Role of the Expert Author in Media Coverage of Art
Download paperSpecialist on educational and methodological work, Chair of Sociology of Mass Communications, Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State Univeristy, Moscow, Russia; ORCID 0009-0005-0832-4733
e-mail: lisa-alisa_93@mail.ruSection: Sociology of Journalism
The article analyzes the role and status of experts publishing materials about art in the media, and also it consideres a range of problems associated with their activities in this area. The most complex and controversial problems of presenting works of art in the media are reported from the point of view of their creators, journalists, theoretical specialists, museum workers, art experts. The results of the analysis of a series of semi-structured interviews with representatives of the above-mentioned groups allow us to assert that the primary problems are the objectivity of materials of cultural topics and the expression of personal experts’ opinions in the media. In addition, we can conclude that the difficulties of modern art journalism are associated with several aspects: the level of education and professionalism of different types of attracted authors; the expansion of the audience with different requirements and very diverse levels of awareness of art issues; the influence of external facts on the work of authors (an abundance of various information, lack of time to immerse themselves in the topic and prepare high-quality materials).
DOI: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.4.2024.2448References:
Ben'yamin V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoy vosproizvodimosti [The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility]. Available at: http://forlit.philol.msu.ru/Pages/Biblioteka_Benjamin.htm (accessed:26.02.2022).
Berger J. (1972) Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin Books.
Bespamyatnova G. N. (2008) Effekty i effektivnost' televizionnoy kommunikatsii [The effects and the effectiveness of television communication]. Zhurnalistika v 2007 godu: SMI v usloviyakh global'noy transformatsii sotsial'noy sredy. Moscow: Moscow St. Univ. Publ. Pp. 6.
Bordwell D. (1989) Making Meaning: Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Chevozerova G.V. (2016) Problemy poznaniya v zhurnalistike. Dostovernost' zhurnalistskoy informatsii [The problems of knowledge in journalism. The accuracy of journalistic information]. Mediaskop 1. Available at: http://mediascope.ru/?q=node/2090 (accessed: 14.04.2023)
Cherepova T. N. (2016) Problemy podgotovki zhurnalistov, osveshchayushchikh voprosy kul'tury i iskusstva v SMI [The problems of journalists' training, who cover culture and art issues in the media]. Zhurnalistskiy ezhegodnik 5: 45-47.
Chernova Zh. V. (2023) Metodologicheskie aspekty ekspertnykh interv'yu: podkhody, vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya [Methodological aspects of expert interviews: approaches, opportunities, and limitations]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny 5: 74–90.
Dahlgren P. (2012) Public Intellectuals, Online Media, and Public Spheres: Current realignments. International Journal of Politics, Culture & Society 25 (4): 95–110.
Donsbach W., Klett B. (1993) Subjective objectivity – how journalists in four countries define a key term of their profession. International Communication Gazette 51 (1): 53–83.
Giddens E. (1994) Sud'ba, risk i bezopasnost' [Fate, risk, and security]. THESIS 5: 107–134.
Gombrich E. (1960) Art and Illusion. A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. New York: Pantheon Books.
Khvostunova O. I. (2006) Eksperty kak sub"ekt politicheskogo diskursa SMI: dis. … kand. filol. Nauk [Experts as a subject of political discourse in the media. Candidate philological sci. diss.]. Moscow (In Russian).
Kotlomanov A. O. (2015) Krizis ili depressiya? Kommentariy po povodu aktual'nykh problem art-kritiki [Crisis or depression? The commentary on current issues of an art criticism]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta 15 (2):161-163.
Kristensen, N., Haastrup, H., Holdgaard, N. (2018) Cultural Critique: Re-negotiating cultural authority in digital media culture. MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 34 (65): 3–9.
Lapshina G. S. (2016) Iskusstvo glazami zhurnalista [Art through the journalist's eyes]. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)
Litvinova A. I. (2023) Professionalizm v zhurnalistike: granitsy ponyatiya skvoz' prizmu nauchnykh issledovaniy [The professionalism in journalism: the boundaries of concept through the prism of scientific research]. Mediaskop 2. Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/2817 (accessed: 15.01.2024).
Maslennikov A. V. (2020) Art-zhurnalistika kak ob"ekt sovremennykh mediaissledovaniy [Art journalism as an object of modern media research]. Mediasreda 2: 43–47.
Prokhorov E. P. (2011) Vvedenie v teoriyu zhurnalistiki [The introduction to the theory of journalism]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ. Рp. 49–50.
Rosen J. (2012) The People Formerly Known as the Audience. In Mandiberg M. (ed.) The Social Media Reader. New York: New York University Press. Pp.13-16.
Skinner Q. (1986) Ambrogio Lorenzetti: The Artist as Political Philosopher. Proceedings of the British Academy 72: 1–56.
Sorokina T. E. (2020) Art-zhurnalistika v sovremennykh massmedia: sobytie i diskursivnye praktiki [The art journalism in modern mass media: event and discursive practices]. Mir nauki. Sotsiologiya, filologiya, kul'turologiya: elektron. zhurn 11 (4): 50–58.
Tsvetova N. S. (2019) Iskusstvo v massmedia [The art in mass media]. Sankt-Peterburg: VVM Publ. (In Russian).
Tuchman G. (1972) Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. The American Journal of Sociology 77: 660–679.
Walsh P. (2003) That Withered Paradigm: The Web, the Expert, and the Information Hegemony. In H. Jenkins & D. Thorburn (eds.). Democracy and New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. 365–372.
To cite this article: Poklonskaya A. V. (2024) Rol’’ avtora-eksperta v osveshchenii iskusstva v smi [The role of the expert author in media coverage of art]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika 4: 24–48. DOI: 10.30547/vestnik. journ.4.2024.2448