Metaphor Framing in Media Texts and Communication about Depression: Findings of Content Analysis and Experiment

Download paper
Ivan A. Aslanov

graduate of the Faculty of Social Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: ivaslanov@gmail.com

Section: Sociology of Journalism

The article presents the results of the analysis of metaphor models used in federal mass media for the period of December 1, 2018 – December 1, 2019 to describe depression. Based on content analysis, the author argues that journalists most often refer to such source domains as ‘spatial bottom’ and ‘enemy’. In an experimental study (a survey involving 544 healthy people of different ages) it was tested whether these metaphors trigger the framing effect. The ‘swamp’ metaphor, as a sub-variety of the ‘spatial bottom’ metaphor, was shown to change the perceptions of depression, reinforcing the belief that depression needs to be treated and that psychotherapy can help in this regard. This metaphor also reduced the average penalty respondents would impose on an employee for not working because of depression. However, these effects were found in the group of respondents of 18– 35 years old (N=330). A different effect was observed in the group of respondents over 35 years old (N=214), with both ‘enemy’ and ‘swamp’ metaphors: they affected only the assessments of whether medication is helpful for depression reducing the average score. Thus, the author concluded that the metaphors used by journalists to communicate about mental disorders affect the audience’s judgments of these phenomena and that the effect depends not only on the semantics of the metaphor but also on the demographic characteristics of the audience (e.g., age).

Keywords: framing effect, cognitive metaphor, depression, media effects
DOI: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.6.2020.322

References:

Ash E., Cranmer G. A. (2020) Transcontextual Effects of Racialized Sports Media Framing: Students’ Off the Field Perceptions of Student Athletes. Communication and Sport 8 (3): 389–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519830621

Aslanov I. A., Kotov A. A. (2020) Vliyanie metaforicheskogo freyminga na otsenku suzhdeniy o primere kategorii [The Impact of Metaphor Framing on the Evaluation of Judgments on an Example of a Category]. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniy 13 (72). (In Russian)

Borisonik E. V., Chubina S. A. (2015) Osveshchenie regional’nymi SMI suicidal’nogo povedeniya [Regional Media Coverage of Suicidal Behavior]. In XVI s”ezd psikhiatrov Rossii. Vserossiyskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Psikhiatriya na etapakh reform: problemy i perspektivy» [The 16th Congress of Russian Psychiatrists. All-Russian Research-to-Practice Conference with International Participation “Psychiatry at the Stages of Reforms: Problems and Prospects”]. St. Petersburg: Alta Astra Publ. (In Russian)

Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. (2000) Peremeshchenie v prostranstve kak metafora emocij [Movement in Space as a Metaphor of Emotions]. In Logicheskij analiz yazyka: yazyki prostranstv [Logical Analysis of Language: Languages of Spaces]. Moscow: Yazyk russkoy kul’tury Publ. Pp. 277–288. (In Russian)

Daalmans S., Schaap G., Rovers M. (2019) Loved and Feared in Fortress Europe: Framing the European Refugee Crisis. Communications 45 (2): 252–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-2063

Fomicheva I. D. (2012) Sociologiya SMI: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov vuzov [Sociology of Mass Media: a Study Guide for University Students]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russian)

Hauser D. J., Schwarz N. (2014) The War on Prevention: Bellicose Cancer Metaphors Hurt (Some) Prevention Intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41 (1): 66–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214557006

Hendricks R. K., Boroditsky L. (2016) Emotional Implications of Metaphor: Consequences of Metaphor Framing for Mindset about Hardship. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Pp. 1164–1169.

Kuncy-Zając A. (2019) The Conceptualisation of Depression in the Italian Journalistic Discourse. Linguistica Silesiana 40: 257–271.

Lakoff G., Johnson M. (2004) Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors We Live By]. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ. (In Russian)

Mould T. J., Oades L. G., Crowe T. P. (2010) The Use of Metaphor for Understanding and Managing Psychotic Experiences: a Systematic Review. Journal of Mental Health 19 (3): 282–293. DOI: 10.3109/09638231003728091

Price V., Tewksbury D., Powers E. (1997) Switching Trains of Thought: the Impact of News Frames on Readers’ Cognitive Responses. Communication Research 24 (5): 481–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365097024005002

Pronina E. E. (2006) Psihologiya zhurnalistskogo tvorchestva: uchebnoe posobie [Psychology of Journalistic Creativity: a Study Guide]. Moscow: KDU Publ. (In Russian)

Prokhorov E. P (2011) Vvedenie v teoriyu zhurnalistiki: uchebnik [Introduction to the Theory of Journalism: a Textbook]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russian)

Radaev V. V. (2018) Millenialy na fone predshestvuyushchikh pokoleniy: empiricheskiy analiz [Millenials Against the Background of Previous Generations: an Empirical Analysis]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 3 (407): 15–33. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518030029 (In Russian)

Robins S., Mayer R. E. (2000) The Metaphor Framing Effect: Metaphorical Reasoning about Text-Based Dilemmas. Discourse Processes 30 (1): 57–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp3001_03

Scheufele D. A. (1999) Framing as a Theory of Media Effects. Journal of Communication 49 (1): 103–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x

Scheufele D. A., Tewksbury D. (2006) Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication 57 (1): 9–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x

Semetko H. A., Valkenburg P. M. (2000) Framing European Politics: a Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication 50 (2): 93–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x

Thibodeau P. (2017) The Function of Metaphor Framing, Deliberate or Otherwise, in a Social World. Metaphor and the Social World 7 (2): 270–290. DOI: 10.1075/msw.7.2.06thi

Thibodeau P. H., Boroditsky L. (2011) Metaphors We Think with: the Role of Metaphor in Reasoning. PLoS ONE 6 (2). Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 (accessed: 01.12.2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782

Thibodeau P. H., Boroditsky L. (2013) Natural Language Metaphors Covertly Influence Reasoning. PLoS ONE 8 (1). Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052961 (accessed: 01.12.2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052961

Thibodeau P. H., Hendricks R. K., Boroditsky L. (2017) How Linguistic Metaphor Scaffolds Reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21 (11): 852–863. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.07.001

Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1981) The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211 (4481): 453–458. DOI: 10.1126/science.7455683

Vyncke B., Van Gorp B. (2020) Using Counter-Framing Strategies to Enhance Anti-Stigma Campaigns Related to Mental Illness. Social Science & Medicine 258: 113090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113090

Wallis P., Nerlich B. (2005) Disease Metaphors in New Epidemics: the UK Media Framing of the 2003 SARS Epidemic. Social Science & Medicine 60 (11): 2629–2639. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.031

Wolff P., Gentner D. (2011) Structure Mapping in Metaphor Comprehension. Cognitive science 35 (8): 1456–1488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01194.x