Media consumption as a field of interdisciplinary analysis
Download paperPhD in Philology, Leading Researcher at the Chair of Media Theory and Economics, Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia; ORCID 0000-0002-8531-3908
e-mail: dunas.denis@smi.msu.ruSection: Sociology of Journalism
The paper examines the current provisions of media theory, the nature of which is increasingly described through the analysis of media consumption as a sociocultural practice; theoretical approaches describing the dynamics of the development of a society in which media communications have acquired the properties of a social system and transformed ideas about society; theoretical approaches to the language of media as a key tool for constructing social experience through mediatization. The article emphasizes the need for cognitive research of the media audience (within the framework of cognitive linguistics and psychology) to verify media effects, which will deepen the understanding of the process of media consumption and its impact, as well as contribute to the further conceptualization of media consumption as a socio-cultural practice within the framework of interdisciplinary analysis. A holistic approach to the analysis of media consumption is proposed, which integrates sociological, linguistic and media research perspectives for a more comprehensive understanding of the influence of media on society.
DOI: 10.55959/msu.vestnik.journ.6.2024.115135References:
Bakhtin M. M. (1975) Slovo v romane [Word in the novel]. In Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. Pp. 132–179. (In Russian)
Bart R. (1996) Mifologii [Mythologies]. Moscow: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh. (In Russian)
Borisenko I. V. (2008) Natsional’nyy obraz Rossii: filosofsko-kul’turologicheskiy analiz: avtoref. dis. kand. filos. nauk [National image of Russia: philosophical and cultural analysis: author’s abstract. dis. candidate of philosophic sciences]. Rostov n/D. (In Russian)
Chudinov A. P. (2003) Metaforicheskaya mozaika v sovremennoy politicheskoy kommunikatsii: monogr. [Metaphorical mosaic in contemporary political communication: monograph]. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. gos. ped. un-ta. Pp. 43–44. (In Russian)
Couldry N. (2008) Actor network theory and media: do they connect and on what terms? In: Hepp A., Krotz F., Moores Sh., Winter C. (eds.). Connectivity, networks and flows: conceptualizing contemporary communications. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Pp. 93–110.
Delanda M. (2018) Novaya filosofiya obshchestva. Teoriya assamblyazhey i sotsial’naya slozhnost’ [New philosophy of society. Theory of assemblages and social complexity]. Perm’: Gile Press. (In Russian)
Deyk T. A. van. (1989) Yazyk. Poznaniye. Kommunikatsiya [Language. Cognition. Communication]. Moscow: Progress. (In Russian)
Girenok F. I. (2022) Filosofskoye istolkovaniye printsipov transmediynogo povestovaniya. In: Rostova N. N. (ed.). Filosofiya transmedia. Kollektivnaya monografiya [Philosophical interpretation of the principles of transmedia narration]. Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russian)
Grinev I. V. (2009) Rol’ natsional’noy rossiyskoy kul’tury v formirovanii mezhdunarodnogo imidzha strany: avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk [The role of national Russian culture in the formation of the international image of the country: author’s abstract. diss. candidate of philosophical sciences]. Moscow. (In Russian)
Grudeva Ye. A., Kizilova N. I. (2017) Leksicheskiy freym kak tip leksicheskogo kontsepta (na primere freyma «vooruzhennoye stolknoveniye») [Lexical frame as a type of lexical concept (on the example of the frame “armed clash”)]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki 6-3(72): 95–98. (In Russian)
Guo L., McCombs M. (2011) Network agenda setting: a third level of media effects. International Communication Association annual conference, Boston.
Guo L., McCombs M. (2011) Toward the third level of agenda setting theory: a network agenda setting model. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication annual conference, St. Louis.
Guo L., McCombs M. (eds.) (2016) The power of information networks: new directions for agenda setting. New York: Routledge.
Guseynov G. Ch. (2004) Covetskiye ideologemy v russkom diskurse 1990-kh [Soviet ideologemes in Russian discourse of the 1990s]. Moscow: Tri kvadrata. (In Russian)
Issers O. S. (2011) Diskursivnaya praktika kak nablyudayemaya real’nost’ [Discursive practice as observed reality]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta (4): 227–232. (In Russian)
Castells M. (2000) Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul’tura [The information age: economy, society, and culture]. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian)
Katz E., Blumler J. G., Gurevitch M. (1973) Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly 37(4): 509–523.
Koen T., Ivanova Ye., Travkina N., Chapayev A., Fioletovoye S. (2021) Konets privychnogo mira. Putevoditel’ zhurnala «Nozh» po novoy etike, novym otnosheniyam i novoy spravedlivosti [The end of the familiar world. A guide to new ethics, new relationships and new justice by the Knife magazine]. Moscow: Al’pina non-fikshn. (In Russian)
Kupina N. A. (1995) Totalitarnyy yazyk: slovar’ i rechevyye reaktsii [Totalitarian language: dictionary and speech reactions]. Yekaterinburg; Perm’: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta. (In Russian)
Kupina N. A. (2000) Yazykovoye stroitel’stvo: ot sistemy ideologem k sisteme kul’turem [Language construction: from the system of ideologemes to the system of culturemes]. In Russkiy yazyk segodnya. Moscow: In-t rus. yaz. im. V. V. Vinogradova RAN. Iss. 1. Pp. 182–189. (In Russian)
Latour B. (2014) Peresborka sotsial’nogo: vvedeniye v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu [Reassembling the social: introduction to actor-network theory]. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. (In Russian)
Leont’yev A. N. (1981) Problema razvitiya psikhiki [The problem of development of the psyche]. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU. (In Russian)
Luhmann N. (2000) The reality of mass media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Makovskiy M. M. (1996) YAzyk – mif – kul’tura: simvoly zhizni i zhizn’ simvolov [Language – myth – culture: symbols of life and the life of symbols]. Moscow: In-t russkogo yazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova RAN. (In Russian)
Malysheva Ye. G. (2009) Ideologema kak lingvokognitivnyy fenomen: opredeleniye i klassifikatsiya [Ideologeme as a linguacognitive phenomenon: definition and classification]. Politicheskaya lingvistika 4(30): 32–41. (In Russian)
Men’shikova Ye. Ye. (2011) Ideologemy v turisticheskom narrative [Ideologemes in tourist narrative]. Politicheskaya lingvistika 4: 229–235.
Merdok Dzh. P. (2003) Sotsial’naya struktura [Social structure]. Moscow: OGI. (In Russian)
Miklyayeva A. V. (2016) Sotsial’nyy konstruktsionizm: vzglyad s pozitsii psikhologa [Social constructionism: a view from the position of a psychologist]. In Gergen K. Dzh. (ed.) Sotsial’naya konstruktsiya v kontekste [Social construction in context]. Khar’kov: Gumanitarnyy Tsentr. (In Russian)
Murzin L. H., Shtern A. C. (1991) Tekst i yego vospriyatiye [Text and its perception]. Sverdlovsk: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta. (In Russian)
Nikonova Zh. V. (2008) Lingvokognitivnaya priroda freyma [The lingvocognitive nature of the frame]. Vestnik Universiteta Rossiyskoy akademii obrazovaniya 5: 38–41. (In Russian)
Parsons T. (1998) Sistema sovremennykh obshchestv [The system of modern societies]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. (In Russian)
Plakrouz K. H., Lindsi Dzh. (2022) Kriticheskiye tsinichnyye teorii. Kak vse stali sporit’ o rase, gendere i identichnosti i chto v etom plokhogo [Critical cynical theories. How everyone began to argue about race, gender, and identity, and what’s so bad about it]. Moscow: Individuum. (In Russian)
Soldatova G. U., Rasskazova Ye. I., Nestik T. A. (2017) Tsifrovoye pokoleniye Rossii: kompetentnost’ i bezopasnost’ [Digital generation of Russia: competence and security]. Moscow: Smysl. (In Russian)
Soldatova G. U., Voyskunskiy A. Ye. (2021) Sotsial’no-kognitivnaya kontseptsiya tsifrovoy sotsializatsii: novaya ekosistema i sotsial’naya evolyutsiya psikhiki [Social and cognitive concept of digital socialization: a new ecosystem and social evolution of the psyche]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki 18(3): 431–450. (In Russian)
Tataru L. V. (2009) Tochka zreniya i ritm kompozitsii narrativnogo teksta (na materiale proizvedeniy Dzh. Dzhoysa i V. Vulf): avtoref. dis. d-ra. filol. nauk [Point of view and rhythm of the composition of the narrative text (based on the works of J. Joyce and V. Woolf): author’s abstract. diss. doctor of philological sciences]. Saratov. (In Russian)
Tomashevskiy B. V. (1996) Teoriya literatury. Poetika: ucheb. posobiye [Theory of literature. Poetics: a tutorial]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. (In Russian)
Vodak R. (2006) Vzaimosvyaz’ «Diskurs obshchestvo»: kognitivnyy podkhod k kriticheskomu diskurs-analizu [The relationship “Discourse society”: a cognitive approach to critical discourse analysis]. Politicheskaya lingvistika 19: 107–116. (In Russian)
Vygotskiy L. S. (1983) Istoriya razvitiya vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsiy [History of the development of higher mental functions]. In Sobraniye sochineniy. Vol. 3. Moscow: Pedagogika. (In Russian)
Yerofeyeva M. A. (2015) Aktorno-setevaya teoriya i problema sotsial’nogo deystviya [Actor-network theory and the problem of social action]. Sotsiologiya vlasti 27(1): 17–36. (In Russian)
Zhuravlev C. A. (2004) Ideologemy i ikh aktualizatsiya v russkom leksikograficheskom diskurse: avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [Ideologemes and their actualization in Russian lexicographical discourse: abstract of candidate of philological sciences]. Kazan’. (In Russian)
To cite this article: Dunas D. V. (2024) Mediapotreblenie kak oblast’ mezhdistsiplinarnogo analiza [Media consumption as a field of interdisciplinary analysis]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika 6: 115–135. DOI: 10.55959/msu.vestnik.journ.6.2024.115135

