The Impact of Open Access on Citations and Alternative Metrics of Scientific Articles in Media and Communication Studies

Download paper
Mikhail I. Makeenko

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor at the Chair of Media Theory and Economics, Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: makeenko.mikhail@smi.msu.ru
Nataliia D. Trishchenko

Master Student at the Chair of New Media and Commu-nication Theory, Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: natahatri@yandex.ru

Section: Theory of Journalism and Media

The article contains the results of the pilot stage of the research into the impact of open access on major relevance indicators of scientific articles on journalism, media and mass communication. The study analyzed scientific articles published during the period from 2015 to 2017 in 32 foreign scientific journals, which are indexed in the international scientometric databases Web of Science and Scopus, and in 11 Russian journals in the category “Mass Communication. Journalism. Mass Media” from the elibrary catalog, which are included in the list of the Higher Attestation Commission (VAK). The research used data from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, Google Scholar metrics, CyberLeninka and elibrary catalogs. The share of open access articles is still rather insignificant, which limits the possibilities of analysing the effects of the new model on key indicators adopted in the scientific community. The results of the analysis of the journals on media communication conducted within the available sample revealed that in general open access has a stronger positive effect on alternative metrics and the use of articles than on citations, which is consistent with the results of previous foreign studies.

Keywords: scientific journals, scientific communication, open access, citations, altmetrics, media communication.
DOI: 10.30547/vestnik.journ.5.2018.326

References:

Antelman K. (2004) Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? College & Research Libraries 65: 372–382.

Antelman K. (2017) Leveraging the Growth of Open Access in Library Collection Decision Making. At the Helm: Leading Transformation. Association of College and Research Libraries. Pp. 411–422.

Davis P. (2010) Does Open Access Lead to Increased Readership and Citations? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Articles Published in APS Journals. The Physiologist 53: 197–201.

Davis P., Lewenstein B., Simon D., Booth J., Connolly M. (2008) Open Access Publishing, Article Downloads, and Citations: Randomised Controlled Trial. BMJ a568: 337.

Donovan J., Watson C., Osborne C. (2015) The Open Access Advantage for American Law Reviews. Edison: Law + Technology 2015: 1–22.

Hajjem C., Harnad S., Gingras Y. (2006) Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How It Increases Research Citation Impact. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering 28: 39–47.

Harnad S., Brody T. (2004) Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals. D-Lib Magazine 10 (6).

Husain S., Nazim M. (2013) Analysis of Open Access Scholarly Journals in Media and Communication. Journal of Library & Information Technology 33 (5): 405–411.

Kousha K., Abdoli M. (2010) The Citation Impact of Open Access Agricultural Research. Online Information Review 34: 772–785.

Lansingh V., Carter M. (2009) Does Open Access in Ophthalmology Affect How Articles Are Subsequently Cited in Research? Ophthalmology 116: 1425–1431.

McCabe M., Snyder C. (2015) Does Online Availability Increase Citations? Theory and Evidence from a Panel of Economics and Business Journals. Review of Economics and Statistics 97: 144–165.

Norris M., Oppenheim C., Rowland F. (2008) The Citation Advantage of Open-Access Articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59: 1963–1972.

Piwowar H., Priem J., Larivière V., Alperin J., Matthias L., Norlander B., Farley A., West J., Haustein S. (2017) The State of OA: a Large-Scale Analysis of the Prevalence and Impact of Open Access Articles. PeerJ 6: e4375

Pooley J. (2016) Open Media Scholarship: The Case for Open Access in Media Studies. International Journal of Communication 10: 1–17. 

Poor N. (2009) Global Citation Patterns of Open Access Communication Studies Journals: Pushing Beyond the Social Science Index. International Journal of Communication 3: 853–870.

Schultz T. (2017) Opening Up Communication: Assessing Open Access Practices in the Communication Studies Discipline. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 5 (1): eP2131. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2131

Teplitskiy M., Lu G., Duede E. (2016) Amplifying the Impact of Open Access: Wikipedia and the Diffusion of Science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 22.

Trishchenko N. (2017) Otkrytyy dostup k nauke: analiz preimushchestv i puti perekhoda k novoy modeli obmena znaniyami [Open Access to Science: an Analysis of the Benefits and Ways of Transition to a New Model of Knowledge Sharing]. Moscow: Webpublishers Association Armchair, Scientist Publishers. Pp. 69–70. (In Russian)

Wang X., Liu C., Mao W., Fang Z. (2015) The Open Access Advantage Considering Citation, Article Usage and Social Media Attention. Scientometrics 103 (2): 555–564.

Wohlrabe K., Birkmeier D. (2014) Do Open Access Articles in Economics Have a Citation Advantage? Munich Personal RePEc Archive 56842.

Xu L., Liu J., Fang Q. (2011) Analysis on Open Access Citation Advantage: an Empirical Study Based on Oxford Open Journals. In iConference ’11, Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, Seattle, 11th February 2011. Pp. 426–432.